Mike, It seems that you spend much time blogging about U.F.O. abduction and reasons that they are false memories/possible demonic oppression ect. Why? And are you going to blog about other U.F.O. related material such as…. oh, the friggin crazy ass lights in the sky being videotaped across the planet? Perhaps how they are connected to occultic “physic” communication and new age beliefism. Or, how/if our gov. has obtained technology from the spiritual realm of the friggin darkside? And, will you speculate please, speculate where you think this is all going and relate it to current events, please.
@B.K.: There is evidence and then there is proof (two different things). Lights in the sky barely make it into the evidence category. And video is even worse. It’s sad, but in today’s world where practically anyone can get over-the-the counter software that is better than the professional special effects tools of only a couple decades ago, video cannot be trusted. I don’t think our government has obtained technology from the spiritual realm (which would not need technology); that is different, though, than the idea that the “inspiration” for certain technologies could have come from the dark side. Again, two different ideas. I do have thoughts about what it all “means”, and those thoughts are for the sequel to The Facade.
Mike, I see. Perhaps a more pragmatic look at the massive amount of b.s. ufology is what I need. Sometimes the lines get blurred. I’m guarded, but it’s hard to see when you’re neck deep in a languid info. pool. Totally looking forward to the sequel. Tried to find the secret blog but have been stumped by Prof. Heiser.
By B.K., November 7, 2008 @ 6:00 PM
Mike, It seems that you spend much time blogging about U.F.O. abduction and reasons that they are false memories/possible demonic oppression ect. Why? And are you going to blog about other U.F.O. related material such as…. oh, the friggin crazy ass lights in the sky being videotaped across the planet? Perhaps how they are connected to occultic “physic” communication and new age beliefism. Or, how/if our gov. has obtained technology from the spiritual realm of the friggin darkside? And, will you speculate please, speculate where you think this is all going and relate it to current events, please.
By MSH, November 10, 2008 @ 9:51 AM
@B.K.: There is evidence and then there is proof (two different things). Lights in the sky barely make it into the evidence category. And video is even worse. It’s sad, but in today’s world where practically anyone can get over-the-the counter software that is better than the professional special effects tools of only a couple decades ago, video cannot be trusted. I don’t think our government has obtained technology from the spiritual realm (which would not need technology); that is different, though, than the idea that the “inspiration” for certain technologies could have come from the dark side. Again, two different ideas. I do have thoughts about what it all “means”, and those thoughts are for the sequel to The Facade.
By B.K., November 10, 2008 @ 8:28 PM
Mike, I see. Perhaps a more pragmatic look at the massive amount of b.s. ufology is what I need. Sometimes the lines get blurred. I’m guarded, but it’s hard to see when you’re neck deep in a languid info. pool. Totally looking forward to the sequel. Tried to find the secret blog but have been stumped by Prof. Heiser.