<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Logic and the Jesus Tomb Discussion, Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelsheiser.com/PaleoBabble/2008/05/logic-and-the-jesus-tomb-discussion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelsheiser.com/PaleoBabble/2008/05/logic-and-the-jesus-tomb-discussion/</link>
	<description>Your antidote to cyber-twaddle and misguided research about the ancient world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:48:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: str</title>
		<link>http://michaelsheiser.com/PaleoBabble/2008/05/logic-and-the-jesus-tomb-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-2005</link>
		<dc:creator>str</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 23:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsheiser.com/PaleoBabble/?p=12#comment-2005</guid>
		<description>&quot;Tabor argues strongly that the ossuary bearing the name Yoseh (composed of the Hebrew letters, yod-waw-samech-heh; Joseph) belongs to Jesus’ brother by that same name in the gospels.&quot;

One more problem with this argument is that there is no Yoseh in the New Testament among the brothers of the Lord but only a Joseph in one gospel and a Joses in another, clearly the same person. 

One might argue that Joses is the Greek equivalent of the Hebrew form Yoseh as the Gospels are written in Greek but that&#039;s not the same thing as claiming that an usual form found on the ossuary is the one used for one of the brothers.

Also, that one gospel&#039;s Joses is called Joseph in another indicates that he would necessarily have been called Joses or Yoseh on an ossuary and that a Joseph might very well have been called by another form in an inscription.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tabor argues strongly that the ossuary bearing the name Yoseh (composed of the Hebrew letters, yod-waw-samech-heh; Joseph) belongs to Jesus’ brother by that same name in the gospels.&#8221;</p>
<p>One more problem with this argument is that there is no Yoseh in the New Testament among the brothers of the Lord but only a Joseph in one gospel and a Joses in another, clearly the same person. </p>
<p>One might argue that Joses is the Greek equivalent of the Hebrew form Yoseh as the Gospels are written in Greek but that&#8217;s not the same thing as claiming that an usual form found on the ossuary is the one used for one of the brothers.</p>
<p>Also, that one gospel&#8217;s Joses is called Joseph in another indicates that he would necessarily have been called Joses or Yoseh on an ossuary and that a Joseph might very well have been called by another form in an inscription.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Jesus Tomb Video &#124; PaleoBabble</title>
		<link>http://michaelsheiser.com/PaleoBabble/2008/05/logic-and-the-jesus-tomb-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>New Jesus Tomb Video &#124; PaleoBabble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsheiser.com/PaleoBabble/?p=12#comment-259</guid>
		<description>[...] prominently featured.  It&#8217;s quite well done.  Having blogged about my thoughts on the tomb here and here, I recommend this for its content and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] prominently featured.  It&#8217;s quite well done.  Having blogged about my thoughts on the tomb here and here, I recommend this for its content and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

