Comments on: New Bible Codes on Barack Obama

By: MSH

MSH — Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:11:53 +0000

@DrFix: Boy, I hear you!

By: DrFix

DrFix — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:54:24 +0000

I’m a firm believer that when something in the Christian/Biblical arena pops up to either glom onto or refute some worldly nonsense… i.e. The DaVinci Code, then we’re long past anything rational and are only into marketing. That you have to work, as in your own book, to straighten these people out is truly sad. Not knocking it just thinking out loud that your time could better be used but if it helps get someone clear then more power to you!

By: MSH

MSH — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:33:48 +0000

@Debra: I’ll post on this.

By: Debra

Debra — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:35:13 +0000

Hi Mike~ It’s true I’ve always been known for my “quest-ioning spirit” and it’s definitely not stopping here. I’d like to preface before stating my next question that it is NOT my intention for it to initiate a thread-starting discussion (yikes!!) There is a numerical issue due to a problem with the letters iota and xi in the P. Oxy. LVI 4499: is it ’616′ or otherwise? Is it relative to copy and/or translation?

By: MSH

MSH — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 05:02:54 +0000

@OJA: All Bible codes suffer from the same problem: the uncertainty of the every-letter sequence of the text (which is different from the words of the text, but that is also unstable, to a far lesser degree). The issue is the letters. Anyone who believes in a Bible code, no matter how well meaning, knows next to nothing about how we got the biblical text. Not a slam, just a fact. Not everyone bothers to study this.

By: OJA

OJA — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:11:40 +0000

Mike, What about this one:

http://www.infinitybiblecode.org/intro.htm