Comments on: Pharaoh Akhenaten’s Unusual Physique: Proof of Alien DNA?

By: MSH

MSH — Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:23:13 +0000

No, I just live in Realville.

Can you please cherry-pick any actual science to show us all that alien DNA exists? That would be nice, and it would show us how bright you are (not to mention making you the next Nobel Laureate).

By: Goncho666

Goncho666 — Thu, 19 Apr 2012 02:26:52 +0000

Well Mr Heiser!
You are arrogance personified!
You cherry pick evidence to bolster your miopic view of the universe, and, as many of these mucho-self assured- “I’ve got science to back me up champions”. You fail to consider any evidence that leads away from your “we know it al”l-because how dare any one consider that we are NOT the pinnacle of life is this vast universe and because we have not concieved nor reached a level of technological prowess to open up the boundaries of space travel therefore NO other form of life could have evolved far beyond the level to which we find ourselves.
Science has neither provided us with undoubtable evidence as to the exact evolutionay path of Homosapien nor has it been able to explain the missing link between us and our homonid ancestors. Let alone expalin how evolution let us escape predation in order to formulate non essentail thought processes such as art music and self awareness. IF all is as you so miopically put SO simple and down to earth why isn’t there an abundance of unquestionable evidence to answer all the vast anomalies that the likes have myself have been researching for the last 2 decades. Sitchin may have it Wrong but he is to commended for his efforts to ecxplore his thesis to the full. While the likes of yourself are a living joke.
I wrote apaper on the syntax anomalies of cuneiform and the dualistic nature of literal as opposed to non literal meaning to the origin of the basis of the language. If YOU did your research properly you would have discovered that Sitchin wasn’t proven wrong as you state BUT it is dependant upon wether you site the literal over the also used pseudo meaning in context of the writing as a whole.
I guess it is you who are tryi ng to baffle your audience with the little knowledge that you claim to have.
You small minded little man.

By: Bobby

Bobby — Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:20:48 +0000

I believe that in another 2 or 300 years, the present society will look back at our notions about the origins of the universe, science and marveled at the fact that we didn’t destroy ourselves or the fact that we believed such frivolous and false contentions. So mankind has been studying the heavens for thousands of years, The Greeks; Sumerians, Babylonians, Mayans, etc. yet it has only been in the last 100 years or so that we’ve begun to grasp the inter workings of the solar system. I am always amused at how we profess to know the nature of things, and how we express our knowledge about a particular thing-usually in absolute terms. Listen as a simple person, ZI am connected to the universe, for instance, all I need is to look up at the moon, the Sun and perhaps catch a glimpse of Earth’s shadow and curve to know that the Earth is round and I am sure that folks deduced this relationship years ago. Science has become ugly and perverted it has lost its way. If you don’t’ buy into the BBT then no grant money, no funding for you. The concept of the BBT is so far out and silly. Please note every time you search for the age of something it’s always different, i.e. age of the universe, age of the solar system, age of the Earth. I am fully convinced that this is a waste of time, unless you can physically watch a thing and count the elapsed time, then finding the age is fruitless. WE are star people, we are the world, the universe, and we are all connected with it and not apart from it. Power is knowledge, I liken it to manure, it no good unless you spread it around, yet we al l know that knowledge is shared begrudgingly. Science is useful and it makes our world better, but it is not infallible and it can be wrong or the application of it can be wrong. I am disgusted with all of the BBT crap, dark matter, dark energy, and black holes. Its crap!!! Plain and simple. When the observations don’t fit, then simply make some crap up to make it fit – Same thoughts on quantum mechanics. its made up crap!!

Please also note that it is not a science that’s readily available to the masses, or should I say that it’s understanding.. Something that is controlled by the few and powerful.
In short, the evidence is so compelling that we are off in our understanding of nature that we refuse to change. Think about this, take a look at the pyramids at Giza and I want you to tell me you believe regular dudes built it with rocks, ropes and pulleys…

By: cody

cody — Fri, 06 Jan 2012 02:56:07 +0000

Also about the head elongation of Akhenaten. It is known that many cultures around the world from the Aboriginies of Austrailia to the Chinook peoples here in the Americas performed skull modification on their young. The head is put in a device that slowly over time leads the development of the skull to the desired result. I should add this may explain why the child of Nefertiti has a modified skull as well (common picture associated with ancient aliens). I will say that it is most commonly thought that this would have been the case of the Egyptians skulls as well. In other words, it was their moms and dads who modified their heads like that because they liked it, not aliens. Peoples idea of what is beautiful shouldn’t be cast aside and the credit given to an alien. I seriously question the claim that they were trying to mimick in some way an alien they had seen. We must then assume that all of the cultures who did this were trying to look like aliens. Modification of the skull seems really crazy, but so does getting your toungue,nose, ears, genitals, or breasts, pierced or modified with plastic surgury. It was simply what people saw as beautiful or hip.

By: cody

cody — Fri, 06 Jan 2012 02:16:23 +0000

I think that we must remember that our own sciences are constantly changing. What was known to be “true” or “fact” just 100 years ago is laughed at today. With our ever rapidly advancing technologies, we are gaining information at an astonishing rate. If Ufos are real objects and not part of human psychology, then eventually we should get to see one. However, underestimating the military’s capabilities would not be wise. They have publicly shown many new weapons MTHEL and sonic weapons and also many new drone craft and aircraft. I would not doubt the whole ufo thing to be a psych-op by the Airforce (who first started the craze by stating then retracting that they had a ufo. ei Roswell) to keep secret any of the technologies they got after WWII.

By: MSH

MSH — Fri, 08 Jul 2011 03:36:16 +0000

state the issue and provide the data.

By: Paul Gragon

Paul Gragon — Wed, 06 Jul 2011 21:28:24 +0000

What are your views on the CNC machine marks found on the statues in ancient Egypt

By: MSH

MSH — Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:21:39 +0000

First, there was more than one paper about Akhenaten posted on this blog. I don’t need to re-invent the wheel that other people in the sciences have made — you don’t even cite the genetics material. That made me suspect you had not read the blog deeply at all — a suspicion confirmed by the rest of your questions. Had you done even the most modest amount of searching, you’d know that I’ve blogged on both items )and the link works – I just went to it):

The “plane and helicopter” nonsense:

http://michaelsheiser.com/PaleoBabble/2010/11/ancient-planes-rockets-and-helicopters/

The lightbulb lunacy:

http://michaelsheiser.com/PaleoBabble/2011/06/egypt-light-bulbs-and-dim-bulbs/

By: iGal

iGal — Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:51:36 +0000

a few questions for you then MSH:

how come you didn’t refute Cooper’s claim that those diseases did not physiologically resemble what was depicted? was it because the paper you cited as a link is only six pages long, with no inclusion of medical examples of either disease to correlate with its hypothesis?

what about the Egyptian wall reliefs of planes and helicopters and the like?

or the reliefs of the lightbulbs that the Egyptians must have used to illumine the interior of the pyramids? seeing as how there is scientific evidence that sustaining a flame is impossible inside the pyramids because there is not enough oxygen, how do you refute that?

have you forgotten it was “science” that first accepted unequivocally the existence of ether, then vehemently denied it, and now allows the idea to resurface as “dark matter”? thus how can you argue the infallability of science?

btw this link doesn’t work (at the time of this posting):

http://michaelsheiser.com/PaleoBabble/2011/06/egypt-light-bulbs-and-dim-bulbs/

By: Lost Angel

Lost Angel — Wed, 18 May 2011 01:23:21 +0000

These Egyptians we also prone to heart diseases ::

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-13422630