Comments on: Another Great Moment in Pulpit PaleoBabble

By: A New Blog Taking on at Least One Point of PaleoBabble | PaleoBabble

A New Blog Taking on at Least One Point of PaleoBabble | PaleoBabble — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:49:10 +0000

[...] documents of the Bible. PaleoBabble readers got a little taste of this silliness with the “666 in the NIV” post I did a little while [...]

By: MSH

MSH — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:09:07 +0000

@steve95054: wonderful

By: steve95054

steve95054 — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:26:00 +0000

"I wonder where Pastor Caustic-Baptist went to seminary." Oh wait....he didn't. That explains a lot.

By: The State of the American Pulpit | The Journeyman Project: Blog

The State of the American Pulpit | The Journeyman Project: Blog — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:59:40 +0000

[...] you would like to read the counter arguments to his video, check out the posts from PaleoBabble & NT blog Last 5 posts in Church LeadershipChurch: 1 Day a Week or 7 Days a Week? – September [...]

By: MSH

MSH — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:20:14 +0000

@tsorenson: yeah, I’d like to know where he went, too.

By: tsorenson

tsorenson — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:15:36 +0000

I wonder where Pastor Caustic-Baptist went to seminary. Perhaps he missed all of the classes that dealt with the words of Jesus, or the teachings of Paul on civic duties (ie: Romans 13)

By: Hundie Jo [dot] Com » The NIV is the “Mark” of the Beast

Hundie Jo [dot] Com » The NIV is the “Mark” of the Beast — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:24:54 +0000

[...] You can’t make stuff like this up, folks. Click on this link to read Mike Heiser’s take on the video :: Another Great Moment in Pulpit PaleoBabble. [...]

By: The NIV is the “Mark” of the Beast | Theology for the Masses

The NIV is the “Mark” of the Beast | Theology for the Masses — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:23:19 +0000

[...] You can’t make stuff like this up, folks. Click on this link to read Mike Heiser’s take on the video :: Another Great Moment in Pulpit PaleoBabble. [...]

By: MSH

MSH — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:37:38 +0000

@bboyJeda: The best translation is the one that a person will read faithfully and that is comprehensible. That’s sort of a truism. There really is no one best translation; they all have strengths and weaknesses. You should use at least one that follows “formal equivalent” translation philosophy (attempts word-for-word translation where that is possible) and one that follows “dynamic equivalent” translation philosophy (“thought for thought”). I like the ESV (it is more textually up-to-date than many others – that is, it includes superior textual readings in the running text that are often just left to footnotes in other Bibles), so if I had to recommend just one, that would be it.

By: bboyJeda

bboyJeda — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:28:42 +0000

is there a Translation you could recommend?…the most accurate to date?