It appears that it’s more the application of HIS methods – with no footnotes, no biography, no index, no respect, no professionalism – that twist the kaleidoscope tube [and breaks it]!

An oxymoron strip-down atheistic proponent. He refers himself as a “Christian Atheist” according to Wikipedia? How can one be a Christian (a follower of Christ) and an atheist, unless one bends the very definition of a “Christian”? Why not, he is part of the Jesus seminar. I’ve seen this guy debate Gary R. Harbermas before on TV and his arguments were very weak. Only non-informed atheistic readers will run at this book and believe what it claims.