Comments on: Ancient City Found on Caribbean Sea Floor

By: Pedro

Pedro — Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:52:39 +0000

It must be fake as it is marcha 2011 and there is no other posts on the net since 2009 when it was posted what so ever. If this would be for real we all would see it on tv already. Shame : (

By: MSH

MSH — Wed, 31 Mar 2010 05:53:51 +0000

I think the general consensus was that it was some sort of reflection within the camera/satellite (someone else replied to this and had that explanation, but I’m not savvy enough on those matters to really parse it out for you).

By: Richard Welch

Richard Welch — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:40:39 +0000

Whatever this is, it is not ruins of Atlantis. No remnant structures of the lost isle (off Portugal) will ever be found since it was blown to bits and sank in a supervolcanic eruption in the 17th century BC. There is nothing left but a giant caldera on the seafloor (See Roots of Cataclysm: Geopulsation the Atlantis Supervolcano in History).

By: Caribbean Structures and Google Earth | PaleoBabble

Caribbean Structures and Google Earth | PaleoBabble — Sun, 17 Jan 2010 06:53:37 +0000

[...] provided some Google Earth coordinates for the alleged undersea city structures I blogged about recently. I plugged in the coordinates and here are two images. Pretty interesting. I have no experience [...]

By: MSH

MSH — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:01:22 +0000

@Wes: thanks – very interesting that they are on land and water.

By: Wes

Wes — Fri, 15 Jan 2010 01:38:10 +0000

Looks to me like digital artifacts. At GPS 19 42 04 74 N ; 71 43 15 20 W on google earth you will see them, however if you look around the same area you will see them on land and water… but could real. I’m not a pro.

By: Isabelle Lafreniere

Isabelle Lafreniere — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:55:39 +0000

I don’t think they are “fake” necessarily, just not what they look like. Looks to me like digital compression artifacts. You see this stuff all the time, not just with satellite photography but with a variety of digital images. Not the first time the mistake would be made. Interesting that researchers seem to think they can get funding to check it out though. They must have some reason to think it isn’t digital compression.

By: Sean

Sean — Thu, 07 Jan 2010 17:13:43 +0000

The supposedly unenhanced images are here:
http://www.heralddeparis.com/got-ruins-undersea-archaeologists-release-new-photos/66899

However I agree they look fake; If you look at a real city, they are not laid out in perfect rectangles, some amount of error always creeps in. I see no roads, no following the terrain’s curvature, etc. Even Brasilia, which was planned out by the Brazilian government before construction, looks nothing like these images — See here:
http://tinyurl.com/y85mlbm

The images look more like micrographs of a computer chip. Time will tell of course.

By: MSH

MSH — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:19:54 +0000

@Tim: could be; we’ll see.

By: Tim

Tim — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:15:26 +0000

The photos look fake. I think it is a hoax.