Presidential PaleoBabble

Well, this isn’t exactly ancient, but I was sufficiently appalled at President Obama’s utterly clueless pronouncement that “Islam has always been part of America” in his speech last week on Ramadan that I felt it was worth an honorable mention. Okay, I know. This is an easy target. We ought not to expect any politician to have any grasp of anything that doesn’t result in filling their coffers with campaign funds or extracting more taxes from us. But we might expect the president to have a bit of a feel for American history.

Apparently the president got this gem of an insight from something called “The Collections and Stories of American Muslims,” the product of a non-profit organization. That organization makes the claim that Peter Salem, a former slave who fought at the Battle of Bunker Hill, must have been a Muslim since “Salem” bears an etymological resemblance to “Salaam,” the Arabic word for peace. Wonderful logic there — and that’s what put me over the edge to including this on PaleoBabble. It’s precisely the same sort of “sounds the same to my ear regardless of whether it has any linguistic – or in this case, historical – support” that far too many Christian “Bible researchers” use to prove this or that piece of paleobabble. And ditto that for the people who think Zeitgeist and Holy Blood, Holy Grail have any intellectual merit. Ridiculous.

Here’s a nice link to a short rebuttal of the comment.

Here’s a bit of information on Peter Salem. I also found several scholarly articles that mention him. This one is representative — see the footnote on page 10 — nothing is actually known about him. For all we know, “Salem” might have been a name given to him to denote where (geographically) he lived as a slave.  It isn’t that far from Boston / Bunker Hill.

If I can find this sort of thing in five minutes, so can the president and his speech writers. But they don’t appear to be interested in research, just propaganda.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

11 thoughts on “Presidential PaleoBabble

  1. I think the basic issue is that people are stupid and believe anything they here. No one checks anything out anymore. The left counts on this to promote is agenda.

  2. Oh dear god.

    Even by the standards of ‘it sounds like’ that is pretty daft. Regardless of the origins of Salem or Salaam, apparently the first name of the guy didn’t cross their mind at all.

    Was that definitely the logic he used to make that statement, if so it is pretty sad and lets face it, unnecessary, given the support of religious freedom he made in that speach.

  3. Where I ministered I got a lot of people who call themselves THC ministers and they claimed that the sweet cane in Moses anointing oil is cannabis, because the Hebrew word sounds like the english word. Have you ever encountered this before? The lexicons that I read don’t seem to have much info on the origin of this word. Any thoughts?

  4. > The left

    Please, don’t suggest the right has a greater love for facts. We have seen and heard the likes of The Washington Times, World Net Daily, FOX News, Rush Limbaugh…

  5. I’m sure there hasn’t been any great number of Mulsims in the US until the 20th century, but didn’t George Washington write a letter declaring his willingness to hire Muslims, as long as they were good workers? Seems to imply there was at least some Islamic workers in the country. And Islam did have a pretty wide influence throughout Africa by the time of the US slave trade. Unless Obama specifically said his statement was base upon that book I don’t see no reason to assume it was.

    • The problem is that Obama’s statement wasn’t based on anything. He needs to cite some sort of documentation or authority that can be checked.

Comments on this (old) blog are closed. To comment on this post, go to the new blog location and search for your post: http://drmsh.com/paleobabble/