Archive for June, 2008
« Previous EntriesOn vacation
Tuesday, June 24th, 2008Just a note - I’m on vacation with limited online access. I’m sure I’ll fall behind on posts and comments. Back July 2.
a2a_linkname=”On vacation”;a2a_linkurl=”http://michaelsheiser.com/TheNakedBible/2008/06/on-vacation/”;
Pre-Scientific Worldview “Problem” and Inerrancy
Friday, June 20th, 2008Taking off on Chet’s lengthy response to my “Definitions of Inerrancy” post:
The first thing I’d like to pursue is Chet’s criticism of the word “affirm” — I also think it’s a weasel-word. You quote 1 Cor. 11:14, which says, “Does not nature itself teach you that if a man wears long hair it is […]
Looking at the Inerrancy Definitions, Part 1
Wednesday, June 18th, 2008Let me say at the outset that I personally have no problem with the word “inerrancy” and want to embrace such a doctrine as an evangelical. My problem is that I’m not sure how to articulate what the word should mean so that it’s honest, defensible, and coherent. I believe truth corresponds to reality (correspondence […]
Definitions of Inerrancy
Saturday, June 14th, 2008Well, here we go with the inerrancy issue. Hopefully by now you have read the required readings for this discussion (yes, they are required; I have specific goals with this thread, and comments posted that make me think you haven’t done the reading will likely not be displayed).
In the wake of the readings, I’ve […]
Peter Enns’ Definition of Inerrancy
Wednesday, June 11th, 2008This is more grist for the mill that begins grinding next week - Peter Enns’ own statement on inerrancy courtesy of John Hobbins’ blog (is John really the Lawnmower Man?).
a2a_linkname=”Peter Enns’ Definition of Inerrancy”;a2a_linkurl=”http://michaelsheiser.com/TheNakedBible/2008/06/peter-enns-definition-of-inerrancy/”;
Technorati Tags: inerrancy, inspiration, Peter Enns
« Previous Entries