Discerning the Dead, Part 3

Posted By on June 10, 2008

We’re at the point now in our intermittent forays into the biblical realm of the dead to flesh out (again, pardon the pun) who’s who in the Underworld. I noted at the start that I wanted to start with the term metim to see if that term spoke of the human dead, as opposed to non-human spirits. More precisely now, I wanted to see if the term was distinct from ʾôb / ʾôbot. I think a good case can be made for that, and so now I’m ready to make a working list of the inhabitants of the Underworld. I’ll be bringing in terms I’ve not discussed thus far, so be prepared for that. Here they are:

1. The human dead

  • This is by far (and perhaps exclusively) the referent of the term metim.
  • This term, then, would be a term that, in contexts that describe an ongoing afterlife in the Underworld / realm of the dead, would describe a ghost-the spirit of a departed dead person. Term number also describes a human ghost.

2. The dead kings of old / the dead Rephaim

  • This category presents a difficulty, and so we’ll be discussing it further. Rephaim could of course die, so it is no surprise that the word metim is used in connection with them. There are questions to address with respect to the Rephaim: (a) should they be viewed as merely and only human or, since they are also one of the giant clans that descended from the nephilim,1 should they be viewed as part human and part divine; (b) when one of the Rephaim was killed, should the departed spirit be viewed as a demon? This was the view of 1 Enoch, for example (demons are specifically said to be the departed spirits of the nephilim giants); (c) are there any biblical texts that have the Rephaim not only as the dead warrior kings of old, but as demonic spirits. For sure the Rephaim are among the giant clans descended from the nephilim, but are the dead Rephaim also demons?

3. The offending divine sons of God of Genesis 6 infamy (a.k.a., the “Watchers”)

  • Jewish tradition is consistent that these beings were imprisoned until the time of the end. Although we are not given this detail in the OT, the NT tells the same story. 2 Peter 2:4 says that “the angels that sinned” were cast into “Tartarus.” This is precisely the Greek word that Jewish texts (like 1 Enoch in Greek) use to describe the place where the sons of God who sinned in the Genesis 6 story were imprisoned.

4. The spirits who have knowledge (“the spirits; that is, the knowing ones”)

  • This is terminology frequently used in passages that condemn mediums and their activities.
  • There is no evidence that this term is used for human dead (see below). These are non-human spirits.
  • Passages:

Deuteronomy 18:9-13 (my translation):

9 “When you come into the land that the LORD your God is giving you, you shall not learn to follow the abominable practices of those nations. 10 There shall not be found among you anyone who passes his son or his daughter through the fire, anyone who practices divination or tells fortunes or interprets omens, or makes potions from herbs 11 or a spell binder, or one who consults a non-human spirit that has knowledge (šōʾēl ʾôb yiddĕʿōnî), or who inquires of the human dead (dōrēš el-hammētı̂m), 12 for whoever does these things is an abomination to the LORD. And because of these abominations the LORD your God is driving them out before you. 13 You shall be blameless before the LORD your God, 14 for these nations, which you are about to dispossess, listen to fortune-tellers and to those who practice divination. But as for you, the LORD your God has not allowed you to do this.

NOTE: verse 11 distinguishes the spirits who have knowledge from the dead. I would argue that the these spirits are non-human entities and that the dead are the human dead.

Leviticus 19:31 – “Do not turn to the spirits (ʾôbôt), to the ones who have knowledge (yiddĕʿōnî); do not seek them out, and so make yourselves unclean by them: I am Yahweh your God.

Leviticus 20:6 – “If a person turns to the spirits (ʾôbôt), to those who have knowledge (yiddĕʿōnî), whoring after them, I will set my face against that person and will cut him off from among his people.

Leviticus 20:27 – “A man or a woman who is with a spirit (ʾôb) or one who has knowledge (yiddĕʿōnî) shall surely be put to death. They shall be stoned with stones; their blood shall be upon them.”

Isaiah 29:4 – And you will be brought low; from the earth you shall speak, and from the dust your speech will be bowed down; your voice shall come from the ground like the voice of a spirit ((ʾôb), and from the dust your speech shall whisper.

NOTE: Lev 20:27 makes it clear that the ʾôb / ʾôbot can possess human beings (the medium), and Isaiah 29:4 has the ʾôbot coming from up out of the ground (i.e., from the Underworld).

5. “Ghosts”

  • The word ʾiṭṭîm is used only once in the Old Testament, Isaiah 19:3. This is the Hebrew equivalent of ʾetemmu (notice the consonants between the Hebrew and Akkadian term are identical), the most commonly-used term in ancient Mesopotamia (Akkadian) for “ghost” as in “departed spirit of a human being.”2 English translations are frequently of poor quality here, so I’ll give my translation with the Hebrew words of importance-you will recognize them by now:

Isaiah 19:3 – “and the spirit of the Egyptians within them will be emptied out, and I will confound their counsel; and they will inquire of the idols and the ghosts (ʾiṭṭîm), and the spirits (ʾôbôt), the knowing ones (yiddĕʿōnî).

NOTE: The ʾiṭṭîm are grouped together with other terms for non-human entities in this passage, including idols, which were thought to be inhabited by the god(s).

6. Demons

  • There are a couple words for “demon” in the Old Testament (that are found more widely in literature in literature of Israel’s neighbors, like Mesopotamia):
  • šedîm (twice: Deut. 32:17; Psalm 106:37)
  • lîlît (once: Isaiah 34:14); the term is associated with the night and with winds; usually viewed as a demonic spirit for that reason. Referred to as a demon in Akkadian literature.

Should “Rephaim” be listed as a term for demon? I’ll address that possibility in the next installment. We’ll also hit on ghost terminology in the New Testament before we wrap this up.

Observation Summary:

1. I think we can say that there is scriptural warrant for distinguishing ghosts from demons. There are, in point of fact, references to ghosts in the Old Testament and those ghosts are the departed spirits of the human dead, not demons.

2. It is interesting that, while the OT says mediums can be possessed by non-human spirits (ʾôbôt; Lev. 20:27), it never says mediums can be possessed by the spirits of human dead. Perhaps this can form the basis of viewing whatever happens at a séance (in instances where the medium is “indwelt” by the contacted entity) as more likely demonic than true contact with the human dead.

3. Recall from an earlier post that Ecclesiastes 9:5 and Isaiah 8:19 suggest that the departed human dead aren’t very good sources of information-but the non-human spirits are called “knowing ones.” It seems we should be suspicious of knowledge gained from alleged contact with the (human) dead-scripturally speaking, the odds are in favor that the contact was made with non-human spirits.

  1. Compare Gen. 6:4, Num 13:33; Deut 2:11.
  2. See the entry for “ghost,” “dead,” and “Etemmu” in Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

About The Author


10 Responses to “Discerning the Dead, Part 3”

  1. Steve7 says:

    Concerning #2

    Proverbs 9 v 18, “Rephaim” are spoken of as in the underworld and connected with the opposite of Wisdom, and the loud woman[ false/deceptive religion?]. No direct connection to the giant kings in the verse though.

  2. MSH says:

    Steve7: Agreed

  3. Matt... says:

    Job 26:5 talks about the “dead” under the waters trembling at God’s greatness. Young’s Literal Translation is the only one I can find that translates this as “Rephaim” instead of “dead”. The commentary at bible.cc muses about whether this refers to the flood. It would make sense if the flood were sent to wipe out the giants/Rephaim.

    On a side note, interpreting the “bulls of Bashan” in Ps. 22:12 has always vexed me. But Bashan being an area generally associated with giant clans (Og, et al), it makes me wonder if it’s referring in typological/prophetic terms to the effort to pollute and destroy David’s line. Maybe that’s a stretch. Thoughts?

  4. James Lillis says:

    Very interesting…

    I think you’ll probably cover this issue when you post about the NT, but it’s interesting that you say Enoch calls the offspring of the Watchers demons.

    Now, my Ethiopic is not fantastic (cough, cough) but I do remember that in the english translation the word demon only appears once, and seems to be distinguished from evil spirits.

    Ch. 19

    1 And Uriel said to me: ‘Here shall stand the angels who have connected themselves with women, and their spirits assuming many different forms are defiling mankind and shall lead them astray into sacrificing to demons as gods.

    I would assume that “their spirits” means “their [offspring who are evil] spirits” and that the demons are possibly the watchers themselves (cf. 1Cor. 10:20).

    Some initial thoughts…

  5. MSH says:

    Matt: The “under the waters” reference isn’t actually to the flood – it is a reference to the location of Sheol, which was believed to be under the waters of the earth. Sheol was also considered to have waters. It’s hard for us to conceive this, since the biblical description is pre-scientific (see the first reading in preparation for the inerrancy discussion that will start Monday. Briefly, the biblical cosmology is one that had a round, flat earth, surrounded by water. The water was circumscribed by the edges of a round dome (the “firmament”) that was over the earth. Underneath the waters was Sheol. “Pillars” held up the firmament, and there were also pillars in Sheol holding up the earth. The firmament had “windows” in it for the water to flow, etc. etc. The OT has all this vocabulary and more, which was shared with the ancient Near Eastern nations around Israel. It’s quite easy to establish this, and there have been whole books on it (about the shared vocabulary and cosmological descriptions).

    The “bulls of Bashan” are demons. I assume you are a former newsletter subscriber and so you know about Bashan as the place of the serpent. After the kingdom of Israel divided, the northern tribes worshipped Baal via bulls and calves — Hosea calls women who worshipped Baal “cows of Bashan” (double entendre there). They surround the crucified victim of Psalm 22. Aslan’s death on the stone table (if you’re familiar with CS Lewis’ Lion, Witch and the Wardrobe) is a terrific allegory of the crucifixion in this regard – the messiah on the cross, surrounded by the hordes of darkness from Bashan.

  6. MSH says:

    James: 1 Cor 10 of course follows the flow of Deuteronomy 32 – again, that critical chapter of OT theology. The quotation is an allusion to Deut 32.17. 1 Enoch has the offspring of the Watchers + human women, the nephilim, as being the source of “evil spirits” and it is them I was referring to. When one of the nephilim died, its spirit or immaterial self was disembodied and referred to as a demon. These demons were sentenced to roam the earth disembodied (1 Enoch 15:7-9). As Nickelsburg notes in his commentary on 1 Enoch, this terminology was used of and connected to demons elsewhere–but you are correct that we don’t have “daimon” here or the Hebrew or Aramaic word for demon. Nickelsburg also connect 19:1 back to 15:7-9, but what’s odd is that the wording of (Greek) Enoch has the spirits of the imprisoned watchers and the evil spirits that proceed from the giants intertwined, sounding as though the spirits of the imprisoned Watchers ARE the giants or can come out of prison along with the giant spirits/demons. I’m still figuring out how to parse this.

  7. Rev. Wilson says:

    I’m new to all this (website, blogging, etc.). I stumbled across this website in search of an apology for Christians regarding popular TV shows like “Ghost Hunters” that is grounded in Biblical Theology and not denominational & doctrinal rhetoric. This could be the place. I’m recently convinced of the Genesis 6 “sons of God” being about something other than the line of Seth which has furthered my questioning of previous assumptions regarding spiritual powers. I pray this study on “The Realm of the Dead,” and, perhaps, some of the related discussion, will help me in my practical and pastoral endeavor in focusing on the Gospel of Christ’s Person & Works.

  8. MSH says:

    @Rev. Wilson: Well, you’ve certainly come to the right place for the Genesis 6 issue. It isn’t a Naked Bible topic right now, though. I have emailed you some material I’ve written on it.

  9. Rev. Wilson says:

    Thanks Mike. I received all that you sent me and am looking forward to the reading and to future posts. I’ll try to get myself up to speed with the rest of you. We are blessed by your research and work. Thank you. I’m open to further suggestions for reading and study on these issues. -Marc

  10. MSH says:

    @Rev. Wilson: Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Please note: Comment moderation is currently enabled so there will be a delay between when you post your comment and when it shows up. Patience is a virtue; there is no need to re-submit your comment.