Comments on: Responses to Mr. Molina’s Second Reply http://michaelsheiser.com/TheNakedBible/2009/02/responses-to-mr-molinas-second-reply/ Biblical theology, stripped bare of denominational confessions and theological systems Tue, 22 May 2012 03:12:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: MSH http://michaelsheiser.com/TheNakedBible/2009/02/responses-to-mr-molinas-second-reply/#comment-648 MSH Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:35:32 +0000 http://michaelsheiser.com/TheNakedBible/?p=176#comment-648 @metatron: I wonder if whoever came up with this idea noticed that the Hebrew letters in "nachash" (nun-chet-shin) are NOT the same as "shekinah" (shin-kaph-nun) spelled backward!? So much for that mystery. Chalk up another boneheaded "discovery" made on the basis of sounds made by transliteration and English characters vs. Hebrew letters. @metatron: I wonder if whoever came up with this idea noticed that the Hebrew letters in “nachash” (nun-chet-shin) are NOT the same as “shekinah” (shin-kaph-nun) spelled backward!? So much for that mystery. Chalk up another boneheaded “discovery” made on the basis of sounds made by transliteration and English characters vs. Hebrew letters.

]]> By: metatron http://michaelsheiser.com/TheNakedBible/2009/02/responses-to-mr-molinas-second-reply/#comment-647 metatron Fri, 06 Mar 2009 23:13:44 +0000 http://michaelsheiser.com/TheNakedBible/?p=176#comment-647 Hey - ever notice that shekinah (Godhead) ????? spoken backwards is pretty close to ha-nackash. The Shiny One. ????? Weird eh ! Check this out : http://www.psyche.com/psyche/lex/nahash.html "The Kohen Brothers were the first who actually made the connetion between the gematria of "Nahash" (serpent) and the gematria of "Mashiah" (messiah) = 358." M Hey – ever notice that shekinah (Godhead) ?????
spoken backwards is pretty close to ha-nackash. The Shiny One. ?????

Weird eh !

Check this out :
http://www.psyche.com/psyche/lex/nahash.html

“The Kohen Brothers were the first who actually made the connetion between the gematria of “Nahash” (serpent) and the gematria of “Mashiah” (messiah) = 358.”

M

]]> By: Jonnathan Molina http://michaelsheiser.com/TheNakedBible/2009/02/responses-to-mr-molinas-second-reply/#comment-646 Jonnathan Molina Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:33:18 +0000 http://michaelsheiser.com/TheNakedBible/?p=176#comment-646 I have to admit I was a bit embarrassed you called my post lofty...I consider myself nothing of the kind, more like hanging on for dear life trying to keep up with all of ya'll! I'm sorry for widening the focus so big as I did, I actually was just trying to see if I was anywhere near the ballpark. I learned from all your responses so thanks. Your first one here though made me think this...it holds true so long as science itself doesn't change (seems like every day there's a new scientific breakthrough, sheesh, I wouldn't be surprised if we DID come back to believing the sky was solid and the earth was flat...rofl). I have to admit I was a bit embarrassed you called my post lofty…I consider myself nothing of the kind, more like hanging on for dear life trying to keep up with all of ya’ll! I’m sorry for widening the focus so big as I did, I actually was just trying to see if I was anywhere near the ballpark.

I learned from all your responses so thanks. Your first one here though made me think this…it holds true so long as science itself doesn’t change (seems like every day there’s a new scientific breakthrough, sheesh, I wouldn’t be surprised if we DID come back to believing the sky was solid and the earth was flat…rofl).

]]>