<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Malachi, Mark, and Two Powers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelsheiser.com/TwoPowersInHeaven/2009/03/malachi-mark-and-two-powers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelsheiser.com/TwoPowersInHeaven/2009/03/malachi-mark-and-two-powers/</link>
	<description>Understanding the ancient Israelite context for first century Judaism's binitarian monotheism and the Christian Godhead</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 13:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: srunge</title>
		<link>http://michaelsheiser.com/TwoPowersInHeaven/2009/03/malachi-mark-and-two-powers/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>srunge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsheiser.com/TwoPowersInHeaven/?p=57#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Okay, since it hates Greek, EMPROSQEN SOU is omitted in D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, since it hates Greek, EMPROSQEN SOU is omitted in D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: srunge</title>
		<link>http://michaelsheiser.com/TwoPowersInHeaven/2009/03/malachi-mark-and-two-powers/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>srunge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsheiser.com/TwoPowersInHeaven/?p=57#comment-64</guid>
		<description>The synoptic parallels attest a similar switch as found in Mark. There is a reading in D from Luke 7:27 that omits ????????? ???,  however, two other 2nd singular references remain:

Luke 7:14  ???? ????????? ??? ??????? ??? ??? ???????? ???,
?? ???????????? ??? ???? ??? ????????? ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The synoptic parallels attest a similar switch as found in Mark. There is a reading in D from Luke 7:27 that omits ????????? ???,  however, two other 2nd singular references remain:</p>
<p>Luke 7:14  ???? ????????? ??? ??????? ??? ??? ???????? ???,<br />
?? ???????????? ??? ???? ??? ????????? ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

