Comments on: Intelligent Design Usurped by Alien Astronaut Theory?

By: MSH

MSH — Mon, 22 Aug 2011 20:32:32 +0000

of course.

I just love the either-or fallacy.

By: Raelitout

Raelitout — Mon, 22 Aug 2011 06:48:35 +0000

Life on earth is the result of the action of scientists coming from an other planet…This is the only possibility! So, we could understand at last the origin of the old books relating th presence of aliens among ours ancestors.

By: eddy

eddy — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 13:12:27 +0000

Would you mind if you mail me an example how to profile a YUI data table? Thx a lot…

By: Nowhere To Run with Chris White » Blog Archive » How 2012 “Enlightenment” Will Lead To Genocide

Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:13:20 +0000

[...] telling us that we just aren’t evolved like them but that we too can be as gods (like them) I will eat my hat if it is not claimed that they genetically created us, because that idea would finally give evolutionist a way to temporarily explain the DNA code, [...]

By: What a Tangled Web! « Ancient Aliens in Mass Media

What a Tangled Web! « Ancient Aliens in Mass Media — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:38:15 +0000

[...] http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/2009/10/intelligent-design-usurped-by-alien-astronaut-theory/ [...]

By: MSH

MSH — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:02:35 +0000

@Cris Putnam: These are good points; my only interest is that I do believe it would be quite easy for “aliens did it” to steal basically every ID arguments. Time will tell if they will want to do that — and as I have posted earlier on this blog, some Christians (to maintain the appearance of theological neutrality) are already saying the ETs could be designers.

By: Cris Putnam

Cris Putnam — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:07:11 +0000

The canard that ID is a “God of the gaps” argument just isn’t true. ID intentionally created this loop hole to divorce itself from the religious claims of creationism. They aren’t “cheating” the peer review process they are being systemically discriminated against by the largely atheistic bias of their peers.

ID could also be appropriated by Hindus or Muslims i.e. “brahmandidit” or “allahdidit” but
does that make the design inference unscientific? ID simply isn’t addressing the question of who the designer is.

I wonder why the proponents of “chancedidit” get the benefit of a doubt when the known laws of science like entropy and bio-genesis are so against them.

Why is naturalism the default position? Starting with an assumption of a supernatural God did not inhibit Newton or Copernicus. In fact, a design inference is what inspired their search for laws and order in the universe!

By: The 2012 Deception » Blog Archive » How 2012 “Enlightenment” Will Lead to the Largest Genocide in History.

Sat, 03 Oct 2009 04:52:27 +0000

By: Intelligent Design One-Upped by Ancient Astronauts? | PaleoBabble

Intelligent Design One-Upped by Ancient Astronauts? | PaleoBabble — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:58:34 +0000

[...] blogged this over on UFO Religions today, but PaleoBabble readers will enjoy the video as [...]