<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UFO Religions &#187; Roswell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/category/roswell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions</link>
	<description>Striking fear into the hearts of retail ufologists with peer-reviewed research and clear thinking.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:39:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Update from Nick Redfern on Final Events Research</title>
		<link>http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/2011/01/update-from-nick-redfern-on-final-events-research/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/2011/01/update-from-nick-redfern-on-final-events-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MSH</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aliens as Demons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roswell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FInal Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parsons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redfern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/?p=573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nick has an interesting post today about possible links to the Collins Elite group, featured in his book Final Events (reviewed here by yours truly). In a nutshell, the update concerns advances in &#8220;memory metal&#8221; that may be linkable to a memo Nick cited in Final Events that had NASA being able to achieve a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick has an <a href="http://eventsfinal.blogspot.com/2011/01/roswell-nasa-final-events.html" target="_blank"><strong>interesting post</strong></a> today about possible links to the Collins Elite group, featured in his book Final Events (reviewed <a href="http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/2010/11/review-of-nick-redferns-final-events/" target="_blank"><strong>here </strong></a>by yours truly). In a nutshell, the update concerns advances in &#8220;memory metal&#8221; that may be linkable to a memo Nick cited in Final Events that had NASA being able to achieve a &#8220;manifestation&#8221; of certain materials in a laboratory that utilized the &#8220;Parsons Technique.&#8221; My take on this is that Parson was of course doing alchemical experiments. But alchemy is what is now called chemistry and materials science. I&#8217;m not surprised in the least that a rocket scientist like Parsons would have an advanced knowledge of chemistry and/or materials science. You wouldn&#8217;t need to connect to demons (or aliens) for that. Occam&#8217;s razor would suggest that Parsons might simply deserve credit for thinking outside the chemical / materials science box, ahead of his time. Any connection with Roswell would be interesting, of course, but would not point to aliens 9for that one would need to know that whatever was produced in the lab was of alien intellectual origin &#8212; and we&#8217;d first need to know there are aliens for that one &#8212; or was not achievable with earthly materials. The latter is basically ruled out by Nick&#8217;s update (palladium does exist on earth), so the former is the issue.</p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 1.02 -->

<p class='technorati-tags'>Technorati Tags: <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/aliens' rel='tag' target='_self'>aliens</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/FInal+Events' rel='tag' target='_self'>FInal Events</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/memory+metal' rel='tag' target='_self'>memory metal</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Parsons' rel='tag' target='_self'>Parsons</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/redfern' rel='tag' target='_self'>redfern</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/technology' rel='tag' target='_self'>technology</a></p>

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/2011/01/update-from-nick-redfern-on-final-events-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review of Mirage Men</title>
		<link>http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/2011/01/review-of-mirage-men-2/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/2011/01/review-of-mirage-men-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 02:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MSH</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roswell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFO but not religious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFO sightings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[espionage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mirage men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pilkington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychological warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFOs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/?p=565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just finished reading Mark Pilkington&#8217;s recent book, Mirage Men: An Adventure into Paranoia, Espionage, Psychological Warfare, and UFOs. Nick Redfern called the book &#8220;one of the most important UFO-themed books you&#8217;ll ever read . . . Those for whom Ufology is a modern-day religion, and one that offers a form of cosmic comfort, will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just finished reading Mark Pilkington&#8217;s recent book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Mirage-Men-Adventure-Espionage-Psychological/dp/1602398003/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1294539886&amp;sr=1-1" target="_blank"><strong><em>Mirage Men: An Adventure into Paranoia, Espionage, Psychological Warfare, and UFOs</em></strong></a>. Nick Redfern <a href="http://forteanreviews.blogspot.com/2010/08/mirage-men.html" target="_blank"><strong>called </strong></a>the book &#8220;one of the most important UFO-themed books you&#8217;ll ever read . . . Those for whom Ufology is a modern-day religion, and one that offers a form of cosmic comfort, will be shocked, angered and perhaps even disillusioned by what they read&#8221; I think he&#8217;s right on both counts, and I hope you can see why I&#8217;d say that by the end of this short review.</p>
<p><em>Mirage Men</em> is Pilkington&#8217;s chronicle of his (along with his friend, John Lundberg) his personal search of the truth about the UFOs. Readers get to vicariously experience his quest as he treks along both an intellectual roadmap of famous (and infamous) UFO episodes and a literal road trip to various locales, including the annual International UFO Convention at Laughlin, Nevada. It is at the IUFO Convention that they encounter the notorious Richard Doty, a Rasputin-like figure known to all those whose interest in UFOs transcends the casual. Conversations and musings about Doty and his duplicitous career exploits are a central focus of the book and no doubt the content of its sub-title (&#8220;Paranoia, Espionage, Psychological Warfare&#8221;).</p>
<p>While readers would learn a good deal about how significant UFO events might be parsed sans aliens, the material concerning people like Doty is worth the price of the book. There is a good deal of space devoted to explaining, in clear and coherent detail, how the ufological research community has been, as Redfern puts it, &#8220;well and truly played&#8221; for suckers. Pilkington skillfully describes how government, military, and intelligence insiders staged UFO events, deliberately manufactured and strategically spread disinformation to keep the alien UFO mythos moving along pre-conceived trajectories. The goal was (and still is) misdirection so as to keep exotic military technology a secret. Readers familiar with Greg Bishop&#8217;s important book, Project BETA, which details how such insiders literally drove Dr. Paul Bennewitz insane with disinformation will recognize the techniques. They may be surprised, however, to learn that these techniques were used on contactees and researchers. That truth is an important message in the book.</p>
<p>Despite these tragic histories and direct contact with some of the perpetrators &#8212; or perhaps because of all that &#8212; at the end Pilkington and his colleague are not inclined to just jettison the whole alien idea. Rather, they confess to being seduced by cryptic comments made by certain of the individuals they meet. But just because some people appear more trustworthy than Doty does not make them so. And even if they are, what readers will discern as they traverse through the last quarter of the book is that these individuals offer no real evidence. Rather, they are just easier to believe. Their believability, however, is neither positive evidence for an alien hypothesis, nor is it negative evidence to refute Pilkington&#8217;s suspicions about the ongoing nature of deliberate duping of those who research UFOs.</p>
<p>Frankly, I can scarcely believe that, after reading this book and Bishop&#8217;s Project BETA, anyone can thoughtfully entertain the alien hypothesis for UFOs. I know people want to embrace it for emotional or spiritual reasons, but it feels logic-defying to double-down on the alien view when there is so much evidence that indicates it is a myth constructed by real &#8220;mirage men&#8221; who wield it so expertly at the expense of so many. In other words, how is it that, in the face of the very demonstrable espionage and psychological warfare that feeds off and propels the belief that UFOs are alien craft, can someone believe that such deception is not a deception? At the very least, people who think carefully should be approaching the alien UFO narrative with a hermeneutic of suspicion.</p>
<p>Toward the end of his review, Redfern speculates why the government has done (and is doing) all this with respect to UFOs:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Personally, I suspect that it is this profound potential for deep, personal change that the UFO mystery offers us that the US Government fears most. It is not so much that UFOs might exist or that aliens could be visiting us that worries the official world. Rather, it is the fact &#8211; and officialdom&#8217;s realization of the fact &#8211; that the phenomenon seemingly has the ability to rewire the collective mindset of the populace, who may discard their old ways, give the finger to the old men in suits and ties that run the world, and become truly transformed.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t make sense to me, because if the insider community (e.g., Doty) wants to keep the alien myth alive, that would suggest they don&#8217;t mind such a transformation. If they wanted to kill it in the name of preserving their status quo, keeping the alien carrot dangling before the UFO research community is an inept way to do so.</p>
<p>I think the motivation is a bit different – but variegated. There is no one motivating factor on the part of insiders (and I think would agree with that). With respect to the variegation, I’ll speak of what I’d call the “insider community” – anyone, regardless of who they are or what agency (or not) they work for, who have secure knowledge of at least part of what the public would identify as the “UFO reality.”</p>
<p>On the part of some, “the ability to rewire the collective mindset of the populace” is precisely the goal, not something feared. The fact that some in the intelligence community work so hard to perpetuate the alien mythology suggests that they want to be in control of the rewiring, not an opposing force to it.</p>
<p>But rewired for what? I would suggest that the goal is the rewiring of humanity in the direction of transhumanism – the upward trajectory of human evolution to be more than human, or to “be as gods.” So what good (or harm) is that? It is part of a fascist impulse.</p>
<p>One of the repeating tenets of human fascism is the need to build collective consciousness. Fascism is all about creating two classes: the ruling elite and everyone else. The task of the ruling elite is made easier when everyone else is philosophically fixated on the collective and what’s good for that collective. If the masses are single-minded, they are easier to control, in that they are willing to go along with what the ruling elite demands – it’s for a common purpose, and a purpose that is deemed good for the most people, the collective. So obedience to the elite is good for all of us.</p>
<p>Modern humanity, though, is thoroughly fragmented—by race, religion, gender, social classes, economics, etc. Fascism seeks to create its own coordinated solutions to all these problems of fragmentation, not because of human altruism, but for the sake of making control more cohesive. This is why, when the fascist impulse began in modern Europe after democratic aristocratic forms of government replaced antiquated ideas like the divine right of kings and its monarchies, fascism struggled to become the dominant political force – people were not willing to set aside their nationalistic boundaries. The solution was “national socialisms” that fomented revolutions – different forms of socialist fascism operating within nationalistic boundaries. But the goal now is GLOBAL fascism, a fascism that transcends boundaries. That will only work with an intellectual transition beyond national borders and language. The world is moving this way, through forces like the global economy and the internet. But so much fragmentation still exists. I would suggest that one idea – and perhaps it is THE idea – that would move people to become a more integrated collective would be if our minds were rewired to define ourselves as ONE species, the human species. If the masses were convinced that ET life is real, that idea would be a major impetus toward rewiring the human mindset. And if that ET life (even if it were never present) were tied to world religions and human evolution, the impact would be all the more powerful. Even more useful than that would be a replacement of human belief systems with one governed by the alien myth. All the elements that fragment humanity would be brought into one collective, coherent mindset. I believe, therefore, that some factions within the “insider community” see the alien myth as a useful catalyst for this global governance. It is a long term strategy but with a comprehensive pay-off.</p>
<p>Other parts of the insider community have more short-sighted goals in mind by perpetuating the alien myth. The most familiar would be that of the military industrial complex (itself a fascist necessity) using the myth to cover its own experimental craft. But the strategy is also useful for protecting funding interests for any black project that is under favor. Others in the insider community simply want to be viewed as the controllers of information, regardless of what the issue is. Holding that position allows one to manipulate people or groups of people with more ease, since it would be fateful to doubt the word of the one in the know. This enables the furthering of an agenda as small as one’s own or that of one’s superiors.</p>
<p>At any rate, the idea that the UFO reality will be a liberating force seems hollow to me. Any “truth” that comes down the pike in this regard will be mediated by someone, and it will never lose its opacity, and so I don’t see it as liberating anyone – save for the one dispensing that “truth” to control those who receive it.</p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 1.02 -->

<p class='technorati-tags'>Technorati Tags: <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/espionage' rel='tag' target='_self'>espionage</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/military' rel='tag' target='_self'>military</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/mirage+men' rel='tag' target='_self'>mirage men</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Pilkington' rel='tag' target='_self'>Pilkington</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/psychological+warfare' rel='tag' target='_self'>psychological warfare</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/UFOs' rel='tag' target='_self'>UFOs</a></p>

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/2011/01/review-of-mirage-men-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UFOs as a Psych Warfare and Propaganda Tool</title>
		<link>http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/2010/10/ufos-as-a-psych-warfare-and-propaganda-tool/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/2010/10/ufos-as-a-psych-warfare-and-propaganda-tool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MSH</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roswell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFO sightings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mirage men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychological warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFOs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/?p=527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UFO Mystic has a review of Mirage Men: A Journey in Disinformation, Paranoia and UFOs posted today. I have the book as well but haven&#8217;t read it yet. The review opens with this question: Is it possible that instead of perpetrating a UFO cover-up the US intelligence agencies have really been promoting ideas like alien [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UFO Mystic has a <a href="http://www.ufomystic.com/2010/10/28/mark-pilkington/" target="_blank"><strong>review </strong></a>of <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Mirage-Men-Adventure-Espionage-Psychological/dp/1602398003/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1288289025&amp;sr=1-1" target="_blank"><strong>Mirage Men: A Journey in Disinformation, Paranoia and UFOs</strong></a> </em>posted today. I have the book as well but haven&#8217;t read it yet. The review opens with this question:</p>
<blockquote><p>Is it possible that instead of perpetrating a UFO cover-up the US intelligence agencies have really been promoting ideas like alien abductions, UFO crashes and recoveries, and secret bases all along?</p></blockquote>
<p>My answer: yes &#8212; and even &#8220;most definitely.&#8221; I came to that position in 1997 after listening to the 1997 Air Force press conference on CNN at the 50th anniversary of the Roswell incident. That was the press conference where Colonel Haines said that part of the Air Force&#8217;s third explanation (their <em>second</em> &#8220;final report&#8221;) for Roswell was that the Roswell witnesses who had been interviewed since the 1970s, when the event picked up steam in the press and publishing, &#8220;underwent time compression.&#8221; In case you&#8217;re wondering what the colonel meant (as was the reporter to whom the comment was directed, in response to a chronological error about how test dummies explained the bodies at Roswell in the colonel&#8217;s explanation), the colonel stated (I thought seriously) that all the witnesses thought they were remembering an incident in 1947, when what they were really recalling was an incident in the early 1950s. Folks, Air Force colonels are not that dumb. It seemed to me that the Air Force <em>wanted </em>to perpetuate the idea of an alien cover-up with a statement this incoherent. I still believe that is the case. No doubt Pilkington&#8217;s book will provide much data and food for thought in that direction.</p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 1.02 -->

<p class='technorati-tags'>Technorati Tags: <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/air+force' rel='tag' target='_self'>air force</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/mirage+men' rel='tag' target='_self'>mirage men</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/propaganda' rel='tag' target='_self'>propaganda</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/psychological+warfare' rel='tag' target='_self'>psychological warfare</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Roswell' rel='tag' target='_self'>Roswell</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/UFOs' rel='tag' target='_self'>UFOs</a></p>

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/2010/10/ufos-as-a-psych-warfare-and-propaganda-tool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Majestic Document Eisenhower Briefing a Hoax</title>
		<link>http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/2010/07/majestic-document-eisenhower-briefing-a-hoax/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/2010/07/majestic-document-eisenhower-briefing-a-hoax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MSH</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Roswell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFO news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hoax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linguist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linguistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[majestic documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanton Friedman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/?p=469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting post from Kevin Randle on his blog today. No surprise, of course, Three years ago I had a number of the Majestic documents tested by a linguist whose expertise was authorship attribution and found the same thing. That was the occasion that caused Stanton Friedman to say some pretty uninformed things about where I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting <a href="http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2010/07/del-rio-ufo-crash-and-mj-12.html" target="_blank"><strong>post </strong></a>from Kevin Randle on his <a href="http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/" target="_blank"><strong>blog </strong></a>today. No surprise, of course, Three years ago I had a number of the Majestic documents <a href="http://www.michaelsheiser.com/MJ%20Test%20article.pdf" target="_blank"><strong>tested </strong></a>by a linguist whose expertise was authorship attribution and found the same thing. That was the occasion that caused Stanton Friedman to say some pretty uninformed things about where I stand on the UFO/ET question &#8211; even though the testing validated some of his own earlier work (probably prompted by Ryan Wood, who would never let objectivity interfere with an investigation). That&#8217;s what happens when you are married to a position and don&#8217;t bother to do something as simple as watching an online lecture by the person you&#8217;re accusing or even reading his material. Makes me wonder that, if Stanton was so sloppy there, what else has he &#8220;overlooked&#8221; that we don&#8217;t know about? It&#8217;s disconcerting since before that hysteria I looked at his work as having high quality.</p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 1.02 -->

<p class='technorati-tags'>Technorati Tags: <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/hoax' rel='tag' target='_self'>hoax</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/linguist' rel='tag' target='_self'>linguist</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/linguistics' rel='tag' target='_self'>linguistics</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/majestic+documents' rel='tag' target='_self'>majestic documents</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Randle' rel='tag' target='_self'>Randle</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Roswell' rel='tag' target='_self'>Roswell</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Stanton+Friedman' rel='tag' target='_self'>Stanton Friedman</a></p>

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/2010/07/majestic-document-eisenhower-briefing-a-hoax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was the Roswell UFO a Crashed V-2?</title>
		<link>http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/2009/10/was-the-roswell-ufo-a-crashed-v-2/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/2009/10/was-the-roswell-ufo-a-crashed-v-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MSH</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Roswell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFO news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V-2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/?p=302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;d never heard of this possibility until I read Nick Redfern&#8217;s post on it. If you read the post, you&#8217;ll discover why. The information was never published.  Thanks to Nick for circulating the information (which of course may be disinformation). I wonder why Stanton Friedman never did so. Perhaps he didn&#8217;t know as well. Technorati [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d never heard of this possibility until I read Nick Redfern&#8217;s <a href="http://ufocon.blogspot.com/2009/10/roswell-white-sands-and-v-2-saga.html" target="_blank"><strong>post </strong></a>on it. If you read the post, you&#8217;ll discover why. The information was never published.  Thanks to Nick for circulating the information (which of course may be disinformation). I wonder why Stanton Friedman never did so. Perhaps he didn&#8217;t know as well.</p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 1.02 -->

<p class='technorati-tags'>Technorati Tags: <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Roswell' rel='tag' target='_self'>Roswell</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/UFOs' rel='tag' target='_self'>UFOs</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/V-2' rel='tag' target='_self'>V-2</a></p>

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/2009/10/was-the-roswell-ufo-a-crashed-v-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Body Snatchers of Roswell</title>
		<link>http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/2009/09/body-snatchers-of-roswell/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/2009/09/body-snatchers-of-roswell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 04:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MSH</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Roswell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFO sightings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Sunshine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redfern]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/?p=279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you haven&#8217;t read Nick Redfern&#8217;s book, Body Snatchers in the Desert, here&#8217;s a recent post on one of the book&#8217;s more controversial claims. The book is well worth the read. Readers of The Facade will know that the alternative to alien bodies at Roswell is older than Nick&#8217;s book, but Nick advances the argument. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you haven&#8217;t read Nick Redfern&#8217;s book, Body Snatchers in the Desert, here&#8217;s a<strong><a href="http://ufor.blogspot.com/2009/09/body-snatching-of-documented-kind-by.html" target="_blank"> recent post</a></strong> on one of the book&#8217;s more controversial claims. The book is well worth the read. Readers of The Facade will know that the alternative to alien bodies at Roswell is older than Nick&#8217;s book, but Nick advances the argument.</p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 1.02 -->

<p class='technorati-tags'>Technorati Tags: <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/aliens' rel='tag' target='_self'>aliens</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/bodies' rel='tag' target='_self'>bodies</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Project+Sunshine' rel='tag' target='_self'>Project Sunshine</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/redfern' rel='tag' target='_self'>redfern</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Roswell' rel='tag' target='_self'>Roswell</a></p>

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelsheiser.com/UFOReligions/2009/09/body-snatchers-of-roswell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

